Biggest lottery-winner goofs
There are many blunders that can come with sudden wealth, but the aftermath of the largest release payout in the Mega Millions jackpot illustrates one of the largest screw-ups lottery winners make: not safeguarding the ticket.
It may seem an obvious precaution, but last week a 37-year-ancient woman came forward, claiming to be one of the three winners of the record $656 million Mega Millions payout, but is so far unable to produce the ticket. Sorry, no dice. The ticket has to be present for you to win. While this drama plays out, let’s look at a few other examples of what lottery winners do incorrect, provided by Frank Fantozzi, CEO of Plotted Financial Air force, and in print in Investment News.
They exchange their lifestyle too much. Rocketing yourself into the stratosphere of the uber-rich may seem fun for a while, but you may later regret losing upset with the common folk who used to be your friends and family.
They don’t have a financial plot. Having a road map is elemental. If not, it’s too simple to spend as if you have a bottomless pit. You don’t. It’s a excellent reason lottery winners don’t come forward immediately; they’re developing a financial approach first.
They reckon they’re getting all the money. Up to 50 percent will go toward taxes, so before commissioning the yacht, make sure you know how much you really have.
They don’t get professional advice. Attorneys and accountants can save you a lot in taxes and help you design a plot that will not leave you wondering everywhere all the money went after a few years.
They don’t follow their own instincts. This may sound counterintuitive to getting professional advice, but it’s not. Public will come out of the woodwork to offer help, so make sure you point out sensibly and find a team that is prudent with an immediate plot as well as one for the long term.
They make stupid investments. See the tip above: Everyone will have a “hot” investment tip. Don’t fall for it.
Do you play the lottery? What’s your dream if you win?
Keep up with your wealth and mortgages, and follow me on Twitter.
Get more news, money-saving tips and expert advice by signing up for a free Bankrate newsletter.
Why the Slowest Investors Win the Race
Anyone who attended kindergarten remembers Aesop‘s fable about the tortoise and the hare. The tale’s moral has implications for investors: Slow but steady wins the race.
Hare investors try to sprint to the end line of a comfortable retirement without girding their portfolios against the perils of volatility — frequent ups and downs in asset value. So they tend to lag far behind tortoise investors, who take these precautions, which I’ll clarify in a moment.
Volatility reflects uncertainty, and markets tend to punish uncertainty with lower prices. Yet just because an investment is volatile doesn’t mean it has no place in your portfolio.
Because they may be less likely to go down with other assets in the portfolio, volatile investments may add highly beneficial variety, renowned as diversification.
Let’s say you own tech stocks like Apple and IBM. Adding more tech stocks to your portfolio doesn’t decrease overall risk, so you add a gold-mining stock instead. Though highly volatile in itself, the gold-mining stock is less likely to go up or down with tech stocks, so it increases the portfolio’s diversification.
Because there’s small correlation between gold-mining stocks’ price movements with those of tech stocks, these categories are said to have a low correlation. That sounds complicated, but you can easily look up the differences in price movements between uncommon types of investments to see whether they’re associated, and if so, how closely.
Aware of the downsides of volatility, tortoises avoid it by assembling highly diversified portfolios. That means traditional investments such as U.S. stocks and bonds, mixed with a dash of non-traditional (alternative) assets. These may include emerging market stocks, Treasury bonds and real estate securities. The price movements of these investments have a history of not being highly associated with U.S. stocks or bonds.
Tortoises are like a savvy retailer on a tropical alternative island who sensibly sells umbrellas as well as sunscreen to help cover losses during rainy periods. Every once in while, the rain falls on everything — which is what happened in late 2008, much to the dismay of investors. In the financial meltdown, stocks, bonds and real estate both in the US and abroad swooned, leaving small tear up for investors.
Tortoise-style investors add a upset of alternative investments, knowing this may cut their overall income some years, but they’ll sleep more peacefully with the knowledge that it can counter-weigh heavy losses in traditional investments.
Hares aren’t focused on this balanced approach. Instead, they assemble highly aggressive portfolios of assets that tend to rise or fall in lockstep. They’re not concerned with cutting their losses because, compelled by greed, they’re not plotting to have any losses ior they judge they can defy gravity. This was not unlike the employees who loaded up on their company’s shares before the recession, only to see their investment go south along with their job.
Like the Aesop’s hare, hare investors are overconfident and turn a blind eye to the ravages of volatility, which take a long time to recover from. Tortoises, having sustained less hurt, take up again their slow but steady progress.
The math of recovering from hits may take your breath away you. Let’s say your portfolio loses 33 percent of its value, leaving you with two thirds of what you had. Many judge they’d be back everywhere they started if they gain 33 percent. But this gain wouldn’t restore their losses. They would really need to make a 50 percent gain to get back to everywhere they started. The reason is that the gain is based on a lower value than what you started with.
Heavy gains followed by just a large losses from volatile investments is comparable to the hare in Aesop’s fable sprinting for periods and then, winded, lying down to take a nap. Like the tortoise, investors with adequately diversified portfolios don’t tend to need as much recovery time.
Such losses are even more damaging than they appear at first blush. Not only do hare portfolios lose time that could be used to make progress toward the goal, but they also miss out on the benefits of compounding from reinvested gains
.
Though tortoises’ gains may be far lower than those made by hares during their sprints, they’re more likely to delight in the benefits of compounding.
These awkward reptiles plod steadily toward the end line while the halting progress of hares leaves them far behind.
Ted Schwartz, a Certified Financial Conspirator®, is president and chief investment officer of Capstone Investment Financial Group http://capstoneinvest.net. He advises individual investors and endowments, and serves as the advisor to CIFG Assets. Because Schwartz has a background in psychology and counseling, he brings insights into private motivation when advising clients on achieving their wealth management goals. Schwartz holds a B.A. from Duke University and an M.A. from Oregon State University. He can be reached at ted@capstoneinvest.com.
Gas prices up = accidents down
When gas prices go up as they have lately, auto accidents go down, according to a new study by Mississippi State’s Social Science Research Center in print in the Journal of Safety Research and Accident Analysis and Prevention. But chances are any money you might save on your auto insurance will just flow back into your gas tank.
Researcher Guangqing Chi analyzed total traffic crashes between April 2004 and December 2008, comparing gas prices to traffic safety statistics. The study also considered other factors correlated to driving-correlated accidents in the state, including age, gender and race.
“The results suggest that prices have both small-term and intermediate-term effects on reducing traffic crashes,” the researcher concludes.
Chi described small-term effects as the immediate decline in accidents corresponding to the rise in mean gas prices over the same monthly period. Intermediate effects tracked the decline in accidents over the one-year period following a gasoline price spike.
Younger drivers tended to account for the small-term decline in crashes while men and older drivers showed more of an intermediate decline in traffic accidents.
The study also was the first to document a link between privileged gas prices and reduced alcohol-correlated traffic accidents.
What do these findings tell us? It seems logical that we probably guide less, and slower, when the price goes up at the pump, which would tend to lessen our chances of becoming involved in an accident. It seems equally logical that younger public may be more price-sensitive than older drivers, and thus may limit their driving sooner when privileged gas prices whack their wallet.
As for intoxicated drivers? I suppose theirs is a choice to either tank or be tanked.
Follow me at a safe distance on Twitter.
Subscribe to Bankrate newsletters today!
Home equity loan rates for April 12, 2012
Home Equity
- 5.26% (line of credit)
- 6.51% (loan)
Rates on loans backed by home equity barely changed in Bankrate’s weekly survey.
The typical home equity loan rose 1 basis point to 6.51 percent. The typical home equity line of credit, or HELOC, rose 1 basis point to 5.26 percent. A basis point is one-hundredth of 1 percentage point.
Track spending against a budget?
[Start VIDEO with Kristin Arnold, Bankrate.com attach introducing the video topic]
Kristin: Do you track your spending against a budget? Bankrate.com recently polled Americans on that very question as part of the monthly Financial Security Index. We’re joined now by Greg McBride, older financial analyst for Bankrate.com.
[Cut to a double screen of Kristin Arnold and Greg McBride]
Kristin: What did Bankrate.com find out about Americans and their budgeting habits?
Greg: Just 58-percent of Americans track their monthly spending against a budget. Some do a small bit better, some not as well. Parents were one group that did particularly well. Sixty-five percent of them said they track their spending against a monthly budget. The reason this is really valuable is that budgeting is really the road map towards savings, which most public don’t have nearly enough of as we saw in last month’s poll.
Kristin: And how are Americans feeling about their overall financial security?
Greg: Jobs and savings take up again to be the real sore a skin condition. Both of those are at their lowest levels of the year in stipulations of the readings … how consumers feel about that. Unemployment’s really high, job growth is really weak, incomes are stagnant … you place all that together and it’s really starting to take a toll on how American’s feel about their financial security.
[Cut to one shot of Kristin on camera]
Kristin’s close: To see more of Bankrate.com’s Financial Security index, log on to Bankrate.com.
[END VIDEO]
Billionaire for a day
If you could experience life as a billionaire for one day, what would you most look forward to: the V.I.P treatment, the opportunity to spend as much as you want on luxury, or would you seek opportunities to help others and make a difference?
What would you do if you were as rich as Warren Buffett for one day?
From the Occupy Wall Street movement to reality TV to Bloomberg’s daily ranking of billionaires, fascination with the uber-rich has only increased, even as the effects of the Fantastic Recession are still being felt.
So with a desire to “walk a mile in their Ferragamo loafers,” New York Times reporter Kevin Roose wondered what it would be like to be a billionaire for a day. With the help of his employer and a few real billionaires, he got his wish.
What struck me about conception the article chronicling his experience was not necessarily the use of the chauffeured limo for the day, the fancy duds or the $45,000 Chopard watch he wore: it was the exclusive access you can only afford with huge bucks. As one billionaire in the article says, “I reckon all (money) does is make things simpler.”
I have blogged in the past about studies purporting that the wealthier are generally no more pleased than the rest of the population because private relationships and health matter more than money. Those who give back to society in a way that provides a sense of meaning and purpose are also generally most pleased, whether they have lots of money or not.
That’s not to say it wouldn’t be fantastic to be a billionaire. In the article, Roose describes wearing custom-made suits, being chauffeured in a Rolls Royce, dining in an exclusive members-only club and hitching a ride on a Gulfstream jet with a real billionaire.
Despite the billionaire’s attempts to downplay the effects of money, insisting that it doesn’t exchange a person — “If somebody’s a jerk before, he’s a jerk when he’s got a million dollars,” he says — Roose ultimately finds having the responsibility of wealth exhausting. He observes that billionaires are surrounded constantly by private assistants, trainers, staff and others, with small time to be alone. In the end, he’s pleased to go back to his previous life.
What is it about a billionaire’s life that you would most want to experience for a day?
Keep up with your wealth and mortgages and follow me on Twitter.
Get more news, money-saving tips and expert advice by signing up for a free Bankrate newsletter.



Debt Relief
Unicef